The Editor Zambia
The call by Barotse Royal Establishment (BRE) through Ngambela Mukela Manyando for increased constituency allocation in Western Province is not only justified but long overdue.
It reflects a broader and legitimate demand for equitable representation, national inclusion, and recognition of regions that have consistently demonstrated goodwill toward constitutional reform. 
At the heart of this matter lies the principle of fairness. Western Province is one of the largest regions in Zambia by landmass, yet its parliamentary representation does not reflect its geographic size, population distribution, or developmental needs.
Constituencies in the province are vast, often spanning difficult terrain and remote communities, making effective representation a logistical challenge for Members of Parliament. Increasing the number of constituencies is, therefore, not a political favour but a democratic necessity.
The Ngambela’s position is further strengthened by the role played by the Barotse Royal Establishment (BRE) in supporting Bill 7. At a time when the constitutional reform process was met with mixed reactions across the country, the BRE chose a path of engagement and cooperation.
This demonstrated a commitment to national dialogue and institutional progress.
In any functioning democracy, stakeholders who participate constructively in reform processes should not be ignored when decisions of national importance are being made.
Rewarding such cooperation is not about patronage but about reinforcing a culture of constructive engagement.
If regions that support national reforms see no tangible outcomes from their participation, it risks fostering apathy or even resistance in future processes.
Western Province has shown that it is willing to be part of Zambia’s democratic evolution. It is only fair that this willingness translates into meaningful representation in Parliament.
Moreover, increasing constituencies in Western Province aligns with the broader goals of decentralisation and inclusive governance.
Zambia cannot claim to be fully democratic if large swathes of its population remain underrepresented.
Development challenges in Western Province, including infrastructure deficits and limited access to public services, are partly a reflection of inadequate political representation.
More constituencies would mean more voices advocating for roads, schools, healthcare, and economic opportunities.
Critics may argue that constituency allocation should be strictly technical, and based solely on population metrics and electoral formulas. While these factors are important, they should not be applied in isolation.
Geography, accessibility and historical marginalisation must also be taken into account.
Western Province presents a unique case where all these factors converge, making a strong argument for increased representation.
It is also worth noting that unity in diversity is one of Zambia’s greatest strengths. Recognising the concerns of the BRE is not about elevating one region above others but about ensuring that every part of the country feels seen and heard.
A Parliament that reflects the true diversity and realities of Zambia is better positioned to craft policies that serve all citizens effectively.
The Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ) now has an opportunity to demonstrate its commitment to fairness and inclusivity. By allocating more constituencies to Western Province, it would not only address a longstanding imbalance but also send a powerful message that constructive participation in national processes is valued.
In the final analysis, the Ngambela’s concerns are rooted in reason, fairness, and a vision for a more inclusive Zambia.
Western Province has earned its case, and the nation would do well to listen.
