The Editor Zambia
The recent comments by Prince Akashambatwa Mbikusita- Lewanika, predicting the collapse of the UPND’s support in Western Province should be viewed as the personal political opinions of an individual rather than an authoritative assessment of the province’s political mood.
For years, Akashambatwa has often projected himself as a spokesperson for Western Province, largely because he is the son of the late Litunga, Godwin Akashambatwa Mbikusita Lewanika. 
While his family heritage commands respect, it does not automatically confer upon him the mandate to speak on behalf of the diverse people of Western Province.
The province is home to many voices, traditional leaders, civil society organisations, business people, youth, and ordinary citizens, all of whom are entitled to hold differing political views.
Like every Zambian, Akashambatwa is free to campaign for the political party of his choice.
However, presenting his political preferences as if they represent the unanimous wishes of the people of Western Province risks oversimplifying a complex and diverse electorate.
His latest criticism also raises questions about credibility. Throughout his career, Akashambatwa has earned a reputation as a prolific commentator and intellectual, but critics argue that his record in public administration has not always matched the confidence of his public pronouncements.
He has often been regarded as a gifted theorist whose ideas have not consistently translated into notable administrative achievements.
During his various appointments in public institutions, including roles associated with Copperbelt Ceramics and the Tanzania-Zambia Railway Authority (TAZARA), his tenure did not leave behind the kind of transformative legacy that would place him beyond criticism.
Likewise, his service as Minister of Science and Technology during the administration of former President Frederick Chiluba was relatively brief, ending with his departure from Cabinet before many of the ambitious ideas associated with the ministry could be fully realised.
Even within traditional structures in Western Province, some observers have argued that opportunities to demonstrate practical leadership did not produce the lasting impact that many had anticipated.
These failures illustrate that Akashambatwa’s own leadership record is open to public scrutiny, just as he scrutinises those in public office.
His claim that President Hakainde Hichilema has “failed to develop” Western Province is highly contestable, especially coming from a proven failure like Aaka.
Supporters and even critics of President Hichilema agree that investments in road infrastructure, education, healthcare, decentralisation through the CDF, expanded social cash transfer programmes, agricultural support initiatives and other development projects implemented during the current administration are enviable records of President’s calibre to deliver.
Similarly, predictions that the UPND is losing its traditional support base remain speculative until tested by the ballot box. Political rallies, interviews, and anecdotal observations are not substitutes for election results. Zambia’s democratic tradition has repeatedly shown that public sentiment can only be measured conclusively through free and fair elections.
Akashambatwa’s views deserve to be heard as part of the democratic conversation, but they should be recognised for what they are: the opinions of one political actor and a failure for that matter and not the definitive voice of an entire province.
